Inpetia Post-Post-Mortem

Posted by (twitter: @Sodaware)
May 15th, 2012 9:41 am

The game: Ineptia.


Coolness 100%
#173 Graphics 3.53
#234 Innovation 3.35
#308 Overall 3.18
#417 Mood 2.70
#446 Humor 2.19
#474 Fun 2.73
#597 Audio 2.02
#700 Theme 2.46


Although I’ve taken part in a few game jams before, this was my first Ludum Dare. I would have liked to have done better overall, and to be honest at first I was rather disappointed with how I scored. Now that I’ve had a few days to look back I’m quite pleased, although I don’t know how I scored so well on graphics because I thought they were pretty bad.

Lessons for next time

My first Post Mortem concentrated on the more technical lessons I learnt, but now I know how I rated overall there’s a few more things that have become clear.

Make the theme obvious

The original game plan was to have you start in a cryo-tube, and be woken up by an emergency light. You would then have to travel around the ship, collecting bits for your robot before placing him the various domes to fight the intruders and collect animal samples. It sounded good on paper, but then I came to my senses and realized that 48 hours would be far too short. The domes stayed, but only really on the title screen and help text.

Lesson: You’ve spent a whole weekend mentally reinforcing how your game fits with the theme, but every other player has no idea. They must learn it in the brief time they play, so make it stand out.

Make the gameplay accessible

I went for a turn-based strategy, which is one of my favourite genres. However, it isn’t exactly easy to pick up and play, and it can be quite slow. It’s also quite difficult to balance in a short space of time, which led to most of the game being purely driven by chance.

Lesson: The player only has a few minutes to judge your game. Make sure it’s spent playing, not reading rules.

Don’t worry about ratings

Finding out how you scored is exciting, and is a good was to gauge how well your game mechanics worked. However, rating below what you wanted isn’t the end of the world. I scored lower than I had hoped, but got some really great feedback (and if you took the time to leave a comment on my game – thanks! I truly appreciate it).

Likewise, take some time to give some feedback when you’re rating other games. Even if it’s only a sentence or two about a feature that would work well or something that could be tightened up.

Lesson: When you’ve poured 48 hour of your time into something, a few words of feedback make it all worthwhile.

Moving forward…

LD #23 gave me a lot of new ideas to work on, and I’m planning on releasing a post-compo version in the next month or so. I went in with expectations about how I’d rate, but instead I learnt far more about games and rapid development.

But next time I will score better :)

One Response to “Inpetia Post-Post-Mortem”

  1. Starmen says:

    I really don’t think you should be worrying about making your game accessible. The type of people who compete and judge in LD probably have a pretty good idea about video games and as such accessibility shouldn’t really be a big problem. Surely you are better off making something that you want to make rather than something that you think other people want to play? That’s what stuff like LD is all about, in my opinion.

    However, I agree with you on literally other point, and I really enjoyed your game. Good job on that thing.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

[cache: storing page]